THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CATS AND POLITICIANS

Cats can lick themselves. Politicians wish they could lick themselves, but have to pay other people to do it.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CAT AND A POLITICIAN? One acts aloof. Every now and then he walks by you and gives you a rub as if to say "yeah, I know you are there." You get excited and go to return the love, and off he walks. You stand there amazed when you catch him doing something, because most of the time he is just a pillow that eats and poops. You spend your hard earned money on him and he acts as though he deserves it. You try to interact with him, but he has the attention span of a ADD kindergarten-er on Red Bull.
Why do we put up with these creatures? We complain how they tear up our stuff, crap in our house, take all our time and money- but when its there time to go WE GET ANOTHER ONE.
And the other- is a cat.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Future of the Saints

Image
LOVE ME SOME SAINTS. When I was a year and half out of law school, I got a call from a lady I helped in law school.  Her uncle needed a new lawyer for his defense cases.  Sure, send them over I said.  That's how I became a Benson attorney. I know a bit about Tom, and more about his brothers.  They are gone now, and I loved them both.  They were good friends.  I was blessed to sing at one of their funerals.  Tom was at best an acquaintance and tough client.  Even today when I see Tom I am never sure if he recognizes me.  Which reminds me of rule number one- Tom hates lawyers.  If you weren't Stanley Rosenburg, his long time friend and attorney, you were just another shark. I digress... Many pundits are talking about the future of Sean Peyton right now.  They postulate what Mickey Loomis wants, and Drew Brees wants.  All that really matters is what Tom Benson wants.  So I will use my small amount of personal knowledge of the Benson mindset, my knowledge of football
Read more

Slippery Slope in the Bathroom

We need to be cautious.  The current administration passed a new rule that people can use whatever sex's bathroom a person identifies with.  Well intentioned?  Likely.  Poorly thought out?  Yes.  Pandering?  ABSOLUTELY This isn't about transsexuals, people who in my humble opinion need more psychological help than physical.  Its intended to help those is transition to use the bathroom of the sex they wish they were.  In truth and in fact, it swings open the door to abuses by anyone. What if I am a good, but not great, athlete is school and I want to play varsity ball.  As a male, I may not get much playing time.  But if I unilaterally declared I felt I was a woman, I could set records on the women's team.  Is this fair to women?  NO.  Is opening their locker room to leering lying losers fair to women?  NO.  It is women who suffer from this ruling, and a federal court correctly stopped it. But that is not always the case with this Supreme Court.  They acknowledge, or
Read more

A Legal Definition of Marriage?

Image
What a hot button topic. Let me make clear off the top - I have no problems with homosexual "marriage". A gay couple whom I consider to be among my closest friends have been together over 40 years! They are "married" now under the US Supreme Court ruling. I love them and am so happy for them. Then am I anti-marriage? Just the opposite, actually.  I am however against the GOVERNMENT redefining the traditional definition of words in order to further a political agenda. The government has no business in redefining the traditional meaning of a religious institution. This impedes the free practice of religion. If you redefine a religious institution then force those who practice that religion to adopt the government re-definition, you impede religious practice. Call it CIVIL UNION. Call it BANANA. Come up with any name you want if the government wants to regulate such unions as it does for the adopted term "married". But don't try to redefine the religious
Read more